|
Scientific papers by
James Martin,
PHD:
Crank Length Doesn't Matter
From
Velonews
James Martin, PHD skewers sacred cows
about crank length and pedaling technique.
His studies of 16 bike racers of various heights doing maximal sprint
power tests of under four seconds duration on cranks of 120, 145, 170,
195, and 220mm showed no statistical difference between crank lengths.
Seat height to the pedal was maintained throughout, but fore-aft saddle
position and handlebar height were not readjusted with crank length
changes, despite variations with crank length of pedal-to-knee
relationship and saddle-to-bar drop.
Further Martin tests showed no statistical relationship between
metabolic cost and either pedaling rate (RPM) or crank length, using
nine trained cyclists riding 145, 170 and 195mm cranks who pedaled at
30-, 60-, and 90 percent of their lactate threshold at 40, 60, 80 and
100 RPM. On the contrary, power output and pedal speed (pedaling rate
times crank length), accounted for over 98 percent of the variation in
metabolic cost.
In another test, Martin had 10 racers perform a 30-second maximal sprint
on 120mm and 220mm cranks at 135RPM for the 120mm and 109RPM for the
220mm. He found that, while the rate of fatigue was less for longer
cranks, the fatigue per revolution was identical. This led him to
suggest that track sprinters, rather than spinning at high RPM, should
select the gear at or just below the one at which they produce maximum
power output. The higher gear, as fatigue per revolution would be
constant, would get the rider to the finish sooner, as fatigue would
take more time to set in.
Martin says that you are then left with two things to go faster, hard
training and good nutrition, then hydration and recovery. Reducing aero drag and
reducing braking are some ways you can minimize the power you must
produce. That’s it. Simple.
|